i did some research and one website acknowledges that windows provides superior buffering of videos compared to that of apple computers.
since i own both type computers, i have experienced this.
even newer and, might i add, very expensive apple computers buffer videos poorly, so i have read.
Wow, Apo! Spot on!
How'd you get hold of my little nose-cone? It's incredible for durability and function. It is speedy on ethernet hookup (no wifi capability). The laptop is a PowerBook G4 (15-inch) and looks like the one above; however, it has speakers on either side of the keyboard. It is brilliant and FAST, even on wifi!
Many thanks!
CoCo
i did some research and one website acknowledges that windows provides superior buffering of videos compared to that of apple computers.
since i own both type computers, i have experienced this.
even newer and, might i add, very expensive apple computers buffer videos poorly, so i have read.
Thanks, Barrold -- good advice; however, both were tossed to me by friends who have the means to upgrade. I'm grateful that both do as well as they do, even if the buffering aspect is dicey. My pcs, over the years, have had problems I have yet to experience on my iMacs.
As I hear, though, there are 2 camps regarding preference. I'm fortunate to get my friends' hand-me-downs. I take anything!
You've been very helpful.
CHEERS!
CC
i did some research and one website acknowledges that windows provides superior buffering of videos compared to that of apple computers.
since i own both type computers, i have experienced this.
even newer and, might i add, very expensive apple computers buffer videos poorly, so i have read.
Interesting, trillaz -- thanks!
BB and Apo:
The ancient desktop, which looks like a little portable TV, is OSX 10.4.11; the laptop is OSX 10.5.8. Google, which may not be Chrome, is updated on the latter and functions well, whereas, on the former, Google is an older version that functions in a limited capacity and resists my efforts to update. I believe you stated why.
Many thanks!
CC
i did some research and one website acknowledges that windows provides superior buffering of videos compared to that of apple computers.
since i own both type computers, i have experienced this.
even newer and, might i add, very expensive apple computers buffer videos poorly, so i have read.
Thank you, Apognophos and Barrold:
You've helped me more here than from what I've read and tried to figure out elsewhere.
Thanks for clarifying the difference between iMac and Apple. Both my laptop and desktop iMacs use Safari. Chrome, which works well on my Dell, cannot install on the former computers. I need outside help, perhaps . . .
Gratefully,
CoCo
i did some research and one website acknowledges that windows provides superior buffering of videos compared to that of apple computers.
since i own both type computers, i have experienced this.
even newer and, might i add, very expensive apple computers buffer videos poorly, so i have read.
Greetings:
I did some research and one website acknowledges that Windows provides superior buffering of videos compared to that of Apple computers. Since I own both type computers, I have experienced this. Even newer and, might I add, very expensive Apple computers buffer videos poorly, so I have read. I've all but given up on youtube. I believe it has something to do with Adobe software.
If you have anything to add, I'd be grateful!
CoCo
when one looks back retrospectively at the very beginning of this organization, you could see that the wts.. was on a structural platform of success, created by cunningly created doctrines, such as the invisible return of.
christ, the end times and the imminently soon to come armageddon, all bundled together.. .. this religious organization like so many others established in the united states was unregulated and had.
no upper governing control over its daily operations.. they proclaimed and taught what they wanted to or needed to sustain their operations as a publishing house.. .
Thank you, thedog, for your posts.
A former elder, I relate to what you are trying to accomplish. I do not doubt your sincerity. You will come to your own conclusions as to what future path you must follow.
Please stay with us!
Best.
CoCo
spinning off from another thread, have jesus' teachings been less than universally helpful to mankind?
how do we measure if a particular philosophy is helpful or harmful?.
i am going to use the "universal morals" listed here.
Good morning, new hope and happiness:
Thank you for the kind words. Wishing you and yours blessings and peace.
CoCo
spinning off from another thread, have jesus' teachings been less than universally helpful to mankind?
how do we measure if a particular philosophy is helpful or harmful?.
i am going to use the "universal morals" listed here.
Good morning, jgnat:
I believe this bears on your question. Looking into the indigenous "religions" of many millenia ago, I have learned that wise and loving matriarchies were the norm until patriarchies invaded and wiped out the former. Dominator religions that allow no variety or self determination amongst their followers seem to present a mixed message, as already noted in this thread. Personally, I am in doubt about the Gospels -- who was Jesus and what did he really say?
I have just received Not In His Image, by John Lamb Lash.
Lash states that the four Gospels (NT) belong to a literary genre known as Hellenistic romance, a sort of novella consisting of miracles, supernatural signs, stock characters, etc. During the first century of the Christian era many of these novellas, which mixed fable and folklore with some realistic elements, were circulating.
They were the pulp fiction of their time . . .
NIHI, p.107
Thanks for reading.
CC
greetings, friends:.
i have just received not in his image, by john lamb lash.. lash states that the four gospels (nt) belong to a literary genre known as hellenistic romance, a sort of novella consisting of miracles, supernatural signs, stock characters, etc.
during the first century of the christian era many of these novellas, which mixed fable and folklore with some realistic elements, were circulating.. they were the pulp fiction of their time .
Thank you, Phizzy, for the good points made. Yes, dear Leolaia opened our eyes to many incongruities.
I'm reading now (same title) about the victim-perpetrator scenario and the redeemer complex.
Heavy duty stuff!
Gratefully,
CoCo
greetings, friends:.
i have just received not in his image, by john lamb lash.. lash states that the four gospels (nt) belong to a literary genre known as hellenistic romance, a sort of novella consisting of miracles, supernatural signs, stock characters, etc.
during the first century of the christian era many of these novellas, which mixed fable and folklore with some realistic elements, were circulating.. they were the pulp fiction of their time .
Thank you, Xanthippe, for your reply.
I no longer trust the axiom,"It has the ring of truth." I've become quite objective in my old age. Perhaps, skeptical?
Best regards.
CoCo
